Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Excellent integration platform is easy to use and to implement.
What do you like best about the product?
One of the best available services to combine different business applications, whether in the cloud or on site. It also ensures the data is synced in real time after this. Another feature I wish to highlight is the API Development Function, in which you can construct simple APIs from the Interface to help manage the data flow. We can simplify our data transfer from one program to another and can also transfer our data in their compatible format. It can also be used for ESB API execution.
What do you dislike about the product?
For a long time I have been using this service and have seen its comparatively better performance than other similar services. It is also stable and handles unintended mistakes. Consequently, I have no concerns concerning its service. However, the service is still too costly and that is what I am most unhappy about.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
For automated transfer of data from other applications, I use IBM App Link. I use Waston and Salesforce very easily with their powerful AI too. We saved a lot of time after using IBM App Connect to maintain and manage the unified database, which was shared between different applications. Another is that we build APIs that we use to create simple APIs that allow us to handle the whole flow of data in these integrated applications.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I propose automatic transfers of data from multiple programs and your own records to be generated on an individual basis. It can also be used for Ipaas and ESB in addition to this. Any company with a wide variety of applications may use this program. It's quick for you for IBM App Connect. The setup is much simpler and much easier to use. You can also build simple APIs that simplify the whole data synchronization process and updating it in real time.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Great integration platform.
What do you like best about the product?
The most excellent aspect is that it can be very readily combined with other commercial applications. This is one of the best services through which all of your data can be handled and documentation produced. Included or used here are effective logging and analytical methods specially built. In combination with other bluemix services such as OpenWhisk and Watson, measurement capacity capacities can be further enhanced.
What do you dislike about the product?
Once I think it should have been more affordable there are just a few little things I don't like. Few data conversion bugs are also present. In comparison, I have noticed no part of the key work of this platform that I hate, I am pleased with my experience on this platform.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I would like to note that the integration has been simple to use for the integration of some cloud based systems and certain local applications. It is often used for data transfer from one program to another and for data translation into media format.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is one of IBM most popular and efficient programs. It can be used on multiple ends. Implementation and usage is often very straightforward, making the work simpler. We've been using it for two years and we haven't had any significant issues. Both the issues will surely be fixed.
App Connect is great for future generations of integration projects
What do you like best about the product?
IBM ACE is robust enough to process large volumes of data and versatile enough to be used in old on-premises landscapes as well as new in-cloud solutions.
What do you dislike about the product?
IBM ACE version 11 does not contain or include all of the functionality of its previous generation product - IBM Integration Bus version 10. Examples: LDAP authentication, shared libraries.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We realized a huge (600+ interfaces) integration project at a major healthcare provider in the U.S. IBM ACE is processing millions of messages including ADTs, lab results, payments, etc.
migrating from IIB v10 to ACE11
What do you like best about the product?
straight forward migration of artifacts. however support for the ITX plugin node, Healthcare connectivity pack is still not aqvailable, i was told that these would be available soon but no eta was provided
What do you dislike about the product?
support for the ITX plugin node, Healthcare connectivity pack is still not aqvailable, i was told that these would be available soon but no eta
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
we are still in the process of migration from IIB v10 to ACE 11 and not yet v=completely realized the product benefits till this point, however the efficiency and performance is exciting
App connect review
What do you like best about the product?
ability to configure mainframe services as rest based services
What do you dislike about the product?
still new. We would like to see a larger payload
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
exposing mainframe services as rest interfaces
Reliable platform
What do you like best about the product?
We have been using App Connect software for most of our real time and integration needs.
What do you dislike about the product?
It is not easy to discover the services within the tool
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Applications can connect in hub and spoke model with lot of ease
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Good to get started
Excited to see this recent announcement of IBM App Connect Integration Suite
What do you like best about the product?
Package of multiple products
Conversion of existing PVU model
Easy to use
Not bounded to use just one product, same can be reused with other products
Conversion of existing PVU model
Easy to use
Not bounded to use just one product, same can be reused with other products
What do you dislike about the product?
Licensing model is still not clear, Hoping this would be announced soon or I might understand more with reps
Developer need to write lot of extra logic/code for logging/monitoring/replay , this should be out of box of product itself like dell Boomi.
Developer need to write lot of extra logic/code for logging/monitoring/replay , this should be out of box of product itself like dell Boomi.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Building multi cloud App Integration
Good product to use
What do you like best about the product?
It proivdes seamless integration and has great messaging capabilities. We have been using it for some critical enterprise level applications and IBM Integration Bus is serving the purpose it is suppose to. The inbuilt integration with MQ is a huge plus.
What do you dislike about the product?
Unhinging it with MQ was a great move. The licenses cost had gone up significantly in the recent years, which is a negative.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Messaging services across the applications used internally and also with som eof the vendor products. We see the foot print increasing in the coming years.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Quick integration with other IBM products, good support from IBM. It is a little bit on the pricy side by it iw worth having the product as it does the job well.
Great logical next step for WMB/IIB - almost there
What do you like best about the product?
Steamlined DevOps, multiple target platforms, Containerization out of the box, excellent support for ICP, OpenShift support on the way.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not yet feature complete/might not be 100% backward compatible with IIB v10
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Logical step for containerization.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Excellent choice for upgrading from WMB/IIB
Challenging to migrate to from IIB v9
What do you like best about the product?
Initially liked the idea of libraries, but they did not prove to be as useful as we hoped.
What do you dislike about the product?
Inability to leverage libraries for adapters, like the SAP adapter.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are still in migration, due to the need to change the migration path when we encountered issues with placing adapters within libraries.
showing 61 - 70